Wrong Picture!

[adelith]

The picture on: #37 2003 Leaf Limited Threads (http://www.juangone.com/collection.php?do=list&year=2003#card3159) Rgr Stand #'d to /25, belongs to card # 17 #'d to /50. ;)
http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=3159
Please somebody remove it.
Thank you!

[adelith]

The picture on: #37 2003 Leaf Limited Threads (http://www.juangone.com/collection.php?do=list&year=2003#card3159) Rgr Stand #'d to /25, belongs to card # 17 #'d to /50. ;)
http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=3159
Please somebody remove it.
Thank you!

Please somebody delete the photo on the Item above!!!:eek:

Here is another a Couple of pictures to be add to the page, two are new cards! :D

1- #113 1999 Ultimate Victory Parallel Front.
2- #113 1999 Ultimate Victory Parallel Back.
3- #55 1997 Studio Platinum Test Front.
4- #55 1997 Studio Platinum Test Back.
5- #116 1993 Finest Error Partially Refractor.
6- #23 1997 Studio Master Strokes 8 x 10 Test Front. (The gold Emblem is Holo).
7- #23 1997 Studio Master Strokes 8 x 10 Test Back.

[mcabee1]

I see the picture above for the Studio Portrait Collection, but cannot find it on the list to add.

[SAM JOHNSON]

Roberto where did you get the studio? i only have seen one other one at the national in Chicago,it was not for sale however.i did offer a nice sum for it and was turned down.is this the only one you have?

[mcabee1]

the studio is mine actually..... it is the only one I have. did the guy at the national have the 8x10 too? i have never seen the 8x10 juan like this, but it does exist.

[adelith]

Hello again Sam, nice to hear from you again!
The Platinum (small one) I get it back in 2004 through ebay from a guy in Plano TX, The Masterstroke also on ebay, in 2003 from a guy in Colorado. :D

Roberto where did you get the studio? i only have seen one other one at the national in Chicago,it was not for sale however.i did offer a nice sum for it and was turned down.is this the only one you have?

[adelith]

Well Chris looks like you are not the only one who have it, since I also have one, plus I never saw the 8 X 10 Studio, but here i got the 1997 Studio Masterstroke Test Issue 8 X 10, so you can see it! ;)

the studio is mine actually..... it is the only one I have. did the guy at the national have the 8x10 too? i have never seen the 8x10 juan like this, but it does exist.

[mcabee1]

i do not have the 8x10 studio....... just the smaller one.

[mcabee1]

just an fyi...... there are both types of the 1997 Studio Portrait collections. The regular and the masterstroke and both have the 8x10 version. They were redeemable type cards that almost everyone passed on as there was just too much going on that year. I believe 500 of each were intented, but far less made it to the public. Adelith, is the jumbo you have #ed?

[mcabee1]

if you type in 1997 studio portrait collection on evay right now, you will see a Paul Molitor and an A-rod set. That will show you how they came originally. Mike can you add all 4 Portrait collections to the list?

[nosterbor]

The picture on: #37 2003 Leaf Limited Threads (http://www.juangone.com/collection.php?do=list&year=2003#card3159) Rgr Stand #'d to /25, belongs to card # 17 #'d to /50. ;)
http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=3159
Please somebody remove it.
Thank you! corrected!

[Gonzaleznut]

All added.

[adelith]

Please add!

Here are another bunch of pictures to be add! :)
Also the pictures #10 & #11 should replace the actual picture on the #23 1997 Studio Master Strokes Portrait Collection.

1- #34 1993 Topps Proof Front.
2- #34 1993 Topps Proof Back.
3- #34 1993 Topps Silver Front.
4- #R19 1994 Bowman's Best Blank Back Front.
5- #R19 1994 Bowman's Best Blank Back Back.
6- #12 1994 Fleer Sunoco Proof Front.
7- #12 1994 Fleer Sunoco Proof Back.
8- #325 1996 Topps Proof Front.
9- #325 1996 Topps Proof Back.
10- #23 1997 Studio Master Strokes Portrait Collection Front.
11- #23 1997 Studio Master Strokes Portrait Collection Back.
12- #6 1998 Circa Thunder Boss Proof Front.
13- #6 1998 Circa Thunder Boss Proof Back.
14- #20 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Front.
15- #20 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Back.
16- #75 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Back.
17- #45 2000 Topps Gold Label Class 1 Proof Front.
18- #45 2000 Topps Gold Label Class 1 Proof Back.
19- #132 1992 Fleer Ultra Juan Gonzalez Dean Palmer Misprint Front.
20- #132 1992 Fleer Ultra Juan Gonzalez Dean Palmer Misprint Back.
21- 1998 Donruss Crusade Red Front.
22- 1998 Donruss Crusade Red Back.

[jjt111]

#3 93 Topps Gold card added and pictured applied, #4 and #5 Bowman's Best card added and pictures applied as well as #10 and #11 scans replaced the ones that were on the 97 Studio card. So the only thing I see different is no number on back where the 1111/2000 is on the normal card and the front has silver foil and not gold. Is that correct?

The cut outs..... I mean over size ...... I mean proofs, still need to be added. As I said in the past I haven't been convinced that I couldn't make one if I had the sheet. But great additions to a collection either way, just like unauthorized autographed cards.

Thanks for sharing,
Jonas

[adelith]

Thank you very much!
About the #10 & #11, the Shadow on the lower right corner on front of the card is a variation, and no #'d on the back of the card, see the difference in the links below! ;)

http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96056
http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96057

Roberto.

#3 93 Topps Gold card added and pictured applied, #4 and #5 Bowman's Best card added and pictures applied as well as #10 and #11 scans replaced the ones that were on the 97 Studio card. So the only thing I see different is no number on back where the 1111/2000 is on the normal card and the front has silver foil and not gold. Is that correct?

The cut outs..... I mean over size ...... I mean proofs, still need to be added. As I said in the past I haven't been convinced that I couldn't make one if I had the sheet. But great additions to a collection either way, just like unauthorized autographed cards.

Thanks for sharing,
Jonas

[adelith]

[quote=adelith;4037]

The following pictures still needs to be add! :)


#34 1993 Topps Proof Front.
#34 1993 Topps Proof Back.
#12 1994 Fleer Sunoco Proof Front.
#12 1994 Fleer Sunoco Proof Back.
#325 1996 Topps Proof Front.
#325 1996 Topps Proof Back.
#20 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Front.
#20 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Back.
#75 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Back.
#45 2000 Topps Gold Label Class 1 Proof Front.
#45 2000 Topps Gold Label Class 1 Proof Back.
#132 1992 Fleer Ultra Juan Gonzalez Dean Palmer Error Front.
#132 1992 Fleer Ultra Juan Gonzalez Dean Palmer Error Back.

[adelith]

Please list! :)

[quote=adelith;4037]

The following pictures still needs to be add! :)


#34 1993 Topps Proof Front.
#34 1993 Topps Proof Back.
#12 1994 Fleer Sunoco Proof Front.
#12 1994 Fleer Sunoco Proof Back.
#325 1996 Topps Proof Front.
#325 1996 Topps Proof Back.
#20 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Front.
#20 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Back.
#75 1999 Sports Illustrated Proof Back.
#45 2000 Topps Gold Label Class 1 Proof Front.
#45 2000 Topps Gold Label Class 1 Proof Back.
#132 1992 Fleer Ultra Juan Gonzalez Dean Palmer Error Front.
#132 1992 Fleer Ultra Juan Gonzalez Dean Palmer Error Back.

[mcabee1]

http://thumbs.ebaystatic.com/pict/330277632573_1.jpg (http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=330277632573)

are the 1st 250 of these gold instead of silver or is this an optical illusion? i won this but have not rcvd it yet?

[nosterbor]

looks interesting!!!!!!!!!! let us know please!

[adelith]

Could somebody please add! :rolleyes:

[quote=adelith;4094]Please list! :)

[nosterbor]

Roberto! you are beating a very dead horse that has be degrading on the ground for 8 months,and is no more than bleached bones!that was the last time i asked for all of those to be added! if it is not theirs,it will not be added!

THE POWERS
THAT BE!

[jjt111]

My opinion on cut out panels has been expressed many times. In this auction, 190257618442, the seller even says its a cut out from a sheet yet calls it a proof. So isn't the sheet the actually proof and cutting the card out is nothing more then a cut out. I have many of these but have them under miscellaneous collectibles. They are great things to have but nothing more then having a glove, shirt or paints card of different colors or a hand autographed card. I don't have a problem listing them under odd ball as panel cards or oversize card but I think we are misleading collectors into thinking it is the same as the proofs that are listed that were designed to be a solo individual card proof.

It's only my opinion. I removed my magazine cut outs, Legends, Ballstreet and such from my personal list and added them to my Misc list as everyone convinced me that they shouldn't be with them. But then to see other cut outs added did frustrate me especially the using the name "proof" with them. My personal list has them as "panels". I do list the different variation of cards as we do here but call them what they are "misfits". Unless I find that there were more then one made.

I lost my mother-in-law recently and with my wife being one of fourteen children it's pretty hectic around here. She was a huge Phillies fan and I'm sure at 82 she isn't in their outfield but I expect she's rooting them on in some pretty good seats. She was a saint in my eyes and I will miss her dearly. I rebuilt her home three times in nine years from river floods and had the pleasure of her living with us doing those times. Time heals I know and expect things to get back to normal after those stupid Phillies win the WS :)

Jonas

[Gonzaleznut]

First of all, I am in the investments world and, needless to say, I have been a little busy. It is not a huge priority for me to come home after a shitty day and add cards to the list that I think are totally crap!! I 100% agree with Jonas. ALL of these are simply cards cut from a sheet and called "proofs". Prove to me that it was an actual part of the printing process by card manufacturers and I will happily add them.

By the way, I spilled beer on a double of a 1992 Topps card. I think that should be added as a variation. Hell, it should be on the 1 of 1 list because I don't think anyone else could get the stain to look exactly the way I have it.

[adelith]

I'm totally agree:
1- They are cut offs from a sheet, I've just receive a 199? Topps Stadium Club Members Only Ring Leaders Uncut of Juan Gonzalez that shows 3/4 of an inch more of the design, than the insert card. It is great to see the whole image, but that does not mean it is a proof card, in my opinion.
2- Maybe we should add them on the oddball list, or add a miscellanius list. I personally would take them out of the regular card list.
3- It is not right to have some listed and some not listed.
4- I suggest to remove the sample cards from the 1/1 list also, I think they should be list as that, samples. It's been proven that exist more than one of some of them!

Ps. I'm very sorry to hear about your loss :(, specially when you have such a good relationship with her.

My opinion on cut out panels has been expressed many times. In this auction, 190257618442, the seller even says its a cut out from a sheet yet calls it a proof. So isn't the sheet the actually proof and cutting the card out is nothing more then a cut out. I have many of these but have them under miscellaneous collectibles. They are great things to have but nothing more then having a glove, shirt or paints card of different colors or a hand autographed card. I don't have a problem listing them under odd ball as panel cards or oversize card but I think we are misleading collectors into thinking it is the same as the proofs that are listed that were designed to be a solo individual card proof.

It's only my opinion. I removed my magazine cut outs, Legends, Ballstreet and such from my personal list and added them to my Misc list as everyone convinced me that they shouldn't be with them. But then to see other cut outs added did frustrate me especially the using the name "proof" with them. My personal list has them as "panels". I do list the different variation of cards as we do here but call them what they are "misfits". Unless I find that there were more then one made.

I lost my mother-in-law recently and with my wife being one of fourteen children it's pretty hectic around here. She was a huge Phillies fan and I'm sure at 82 she isn't in their outfield but I expect she's rooting them on in some pretty good seats. She was a saint in my eyes and I will miss her dearly. I rebuilt her home three times in nine years from river floods and had the pleasure of her living with us doing those times. Time heals I know and expect things to get back to normal after those stupid Phillies win the WS :)

Jonas

[nosterbor]

My opinion on cut out panels has been expressed many times. In this auction, 190257618442, the seller even says its a cut out from a sheet yet calls it a proof. So isn't the sheet the actually proof and cutting the card out is nothing more then a cut out. I have many of these but have them under miscellaneous collectibles. They are great things to have but nothing more then having a glove, shirt or paints card of different colors or a hand autographed card. I don't have a problem listing them under odd ball as panel cards or oversize card but I think we are misleading collectors into thinking it is the same as the proofs that are listed that were designed to be a solo individual card proof.

It's only my opinion. I removed my magazine cut outs, Legends, Ballstreet and such from my personal list and added them to my Misc list as everyone convinced me that they shouldn't be with them. But then to see other cut outs added did frustrate me especially the using the name "proof" with them. My personal list has them as "panels". I do list the different variation of cards as we do here but call them what they are "misfits". Unless I find that there were more then one made.

I lost my mother-in-law recently and with my wife being one of fourteen children it's pretty hectic around here. She was a huge Phillies fan and I'm sure at 82 she isn't in their outfield but I expect she's rooting them on in some pretty good seats. She was a saint in my eyes and I will miss her dearly. I rebuilt her home three times in nine years from river floods and had the pleasure of her living with us doing those times. Time heals I know and expect things to get back to normal after those stupid Phillies win the WS :)

Jonassorry for the bad loss you have suffered!

[nosterbor]

First of all, I am in the investments world and, needless to say, I have been a little busy. It is not a huge priority for me to come home after a shitty day and add cards to the list that I think are totally crap!! I 100% agree with Jonas. ALL of these are simply cards cut from a sheet and called "proofs". Prove to me that it was an actual part of the printing process by card manufacturers and I will happily add them.

By the way, I spilled beer on a double of a 1992 Topps card. I think that should be added as a variation. Hell, it should be on the 1 of 1 list because I don't think anyone else could get the stain to look exactly the way I have it.are you sure it is 2 t's and not 1?sorry about your 2-t or is it a 1 t day:D however they should have let it crash! 700 billion and it is still dumping! the gov should mind their own.and keep out of every one else's! it is their prob in the 1st place! go after the MORONS who took out the loans in the first place,when they knew they could not afford them after the rate adjusted! do they not know what adjustable rate is?? it just tee's me off!garnish their wages untill the thing is paid off! how can you buy a house on wellfair? way to go dems!!!!!:rolleyes:

[adelith]

Jonas the Sunoco card already exist in the list, but there is no picture of the card, also I've add the Donruss Crusade Red and a 1992 error card. Could you please add those pictures?
Thank you in advance. :)
Roberto.

#3 93 Topps Gold card added and pictured applied, #4 and #5 Bowman's Best card added and pictures applied as well as #10 and #11 scans replaced the ones that were on the 97 Studio card. So the only thing I see different is no number on back where the 1111/2000 is on the normal card and the front has silver foil and not gold. Is that correct?

The cut outs..... I mean over size ...... I mean proofs, still need to be added. As I said in the past I haven't been convinced that I couldn't make one if I had the sheet. But great additions to a collection either way, just like unauthorized autographed cards.

Thanks for sharing,
Jonas

[jzk_ksy]

Wow...The Crusade red is an awesome card!!!

Kevin

[nosterbor]

where is it?

[adelith]

2nd. page of this thread, with the rest of the pictures I posted and have not been added yet.

where is it?

[Gonzaleznut]

Could somebody please add! :rolleyes:

[quote=adelith;4094]Please list! :)


I have finally added all of the crappy oversize cutouts!!! I listed them in the Oddball section. I will eventually be moving all of those "Proofs" to that section of the list as well as renaming them "Oversize Cut Outs."

If you don't like it..too bad. At least they will all be listed.

[freddie]

[quote=adelith;4102]Could somebody please add! :rolleyes:




I have finally added all of the crappy oversize cutouts!!! I listed them in the Oddball section. I will eventually be moving all of those "Proofs" to that section of the list as well as renaming them "Oversize Cut Outs."

If you don't like it..too bad. At least they will all be listed.
Good decision.

[adelith]

I agree with Freddie, eventhough you dont like it, that's the right thing to do, as Chris said we have to be consistent...:rolleyes:

[quote=adelith;4102]Could somebody please add! :rolleyes:




I have finally added all of the crappy oversize cutouts!!! I listed them in the Oddball section. I will eventually be moving all of those "Proofs" to that section of the list as well as renaming them "Oversize Cut Outs."

If you don't like it..too bad. At least they will all be listed.

[mcabee1]

Thanks

[adelith]

You missed this one:
http://www.juangone.com/pictures.php?cardid=96065

[quote=adelith;4102]Could somebody please add! :rolleyes:




I have finally added all of the crappy oversize cutouts!!! I listed them in the Oddball section. I will eventually be moving all of those "Proofs" to that section of the list as well as renaming them "Oversize Cut Outs."

If you don't like it..too bad. At least they will all be listed.