Anything you need for the site?
 

If there is something you would like the site to do but is currently lacking, let me know. Would a link here or there, or some added functionality help you? Let me know.

Some examples that I hope to implement soon.

- When looking at a card, link the card's title back to the position on the list so you can get back to it in case you came to the card's link from someone having posted in a thread.
- Allow you to change your card totals from each card's individual page.
- Allow all of the card pictures to be viewed in a gallery format.

I implemented the Bio page today. If you have anything to add to it, let us know.

I think I have suggested this before, but I would love to have columns on the main "Collecting" page that shows "Total Cards" on top of the different. I would also like to see a "Total Collection Value" that includes the values of dupes.

Ok, that shouldn't be too hard to do.

I would also like to see a percentage column next to the pictures column for each year so that we know how complete we are with the scans.

Unless anyone thinks that would clutter it up too much.

That would be a little more tricky to achieve due to the database design.

Fair enough. By the way I think this an unbelievably complex and professional site.

You can now see a collector's total number of cards on the main page.

All of the info is now there, the only problem is that it is a lot of info and make the display complicated to say the least.

I agree that it is more complicated, but I like it and it is more complete.

I love all of the changes and...H-O-L-Y C-R-A-P !!!! Rob's collection is even more amazing when you see it like that. I got to see it personally last week and believe me guys, it is just as impressive in person.

Freddy is there any way we can have a sept, column that states how many cards are not priced due to scarcity? maybe a total at the bottom,or better yet on the side for each year. this looks fantatic right now. great job!

I was wondering wether we could assign some pricing to those cards? Who knows there worth better then us? Or do we want to keep it strickly Beckett value? With the low - high we would have a wide range. I couldn't amagine anyone keeping up with current Beckett book value so changing N/A to what we paid or would pay shouldn't hurt. Like my 93 Donruss Elite Jumbo sample, I know I paid a 100 for it but it could only be worth 50 or maybe more 125. So I feel that card would go low 50 - high 125. With no arguements that is what it would be! Opinions on if any should be changed?

I've always thought that we should be entering values for all of the N/A cards. We have a good grasp on what cards would sell for.

The only thing that I am hesitant on is that when pricing the N/A cards, you will enter the prices that you expect it would sell for. All of the cards we have priced now, are priced at what Beckett was when I created the database. Those cards are not priced at what they sell for, but generally quite higher than what they sell for. We can end up with all of the N/A cards going to realistic prices while the existing cards stay at the inflated beckett prices. I think we have to consider repricing all of the cards to general eBay levels.